The Body Count
A controversial study by American and Iraqi public health researchers from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health estimates that 601,027 Iraqi civilians have died violent deaths since the U.S. invasion in March 2003 – about 15,000 a month or 500 a day.
The study says the mortality rate since the war began is 3.6 times higher than the rate before the war. Gunshots accounted for 56% of the violent deaths, the largest cause; car bombs accounted for 13%. Coalition military action is reportedly responsible for 31% of the violent deaths since March 2003. That percentage has declined from 2003 to 2006, which indicates that as time goes by the sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites is causing an increasingly higher loss of life than the military operations.
U.S. and Iraqi officials dispute these findings. The John Hopkins monthly estimate is four times higher than the monthly estimate issued by the Iraqi government for July, which was the highest month for civilian deaths since the invasion. The most recent U.S. military report estimates the daily casualty rate rose from 26 a day in 2004 to almost 120 a day in August 2006. The most recent U. N. figure assumes a daily rate of about 97.
The Johns Hopkins researchers claim that the new study is statistically more valid than an earlier and equally controversial study published in The Lancet. They point out that this study used a method similar to the one used to estimate violent deaths in Darfur and the Congo. The New York Times reports that U.S. statistics experts who have reviewed the Johns Hopkins study say the methods used appear to be legitimate. But, the researchers acknowledge that the study is not a precise count and has a margin of error ranging from 426,369 to 793,663 deaths.
We don’t need to accept the 600,000 number to be stunned by the study. If the study is two to three times as high as it should be, and the number of violent deaths is “only” 200,000 – 300,000, that’s stunning enough. In fact, if the correct number of violent deaths in Iraq is “only” 100,000 that is twice the number being used in various government estimates.
The Johns Hopkins study can be far off the mark and still be a stark reminder of the full cost being paid for the unabated violence in Iraq. The value of the life of an innocent Iraqi is the same as the value of the life of an innocent American and we can’t ignore the fact that the cost of the war and resulting sectarian violence in Iraq isn’t measured by just the number of Coalition forces who are killed. The latter number continues to grow and is bad enough, but if Iraqis are dying at the rate of 50:1 or 100:1, much less 200:1, then we must unite around a new course of action in that country as soon as possible.
Mr. Baker, please send us that report of yours quickly, if you don't mind.
2 Comments:
"The value of the life of an innocent Iraqi is the same as the value of the life of an innocent American and we can’t ignore the fact that the cost of the war and resulting sectarian violence in Iraq isn’t measured by just the number of Coalition forces who are killed."
This has bothered me immensely from the beginning. Since the Iraqis didn't invite us over (yeah, yeah, I know--"Purple fingers, they all came out to vote!" That doesn't mean they want to get killed...) I think civilian loss of life is a critical issue.
Try putting yourself in their shoes...someone comes to your country to "help out." It looks promising. Then things start to get a little crazy, out of control. Your neighbor gets shot. Then your son-in-law. Maybe you start to wonder if having this helpful country here is such a good thing...but they don’t plan on leaving because they have an idea about what “winning” means. And they are staying until THEY “win…”
There was an interesting article about this study in the Wall Street Journal a week or so ago. What I remember is that the writer argued that the Johns Hopkins team used 47 "cluster points" for their sample of ~1,800 interviews. He said that that many cluster points was unacceptable for a survey of a junior high school, let alone an entire country.
An appendix in the study lists other studies of mortality in war zones with many more cluster points used for those studies. When contacted, one of the primary authors of the study said that Appendix was written by a student so should be ignored. That of course makes one wonder what else should be ignored in the study.
I submit that public policy decisions based on this study may impact millions of Iraqis and Americans. The right answer matters.
Post a Comment
<< Home