Breast Ironing
Countries in the industrialized “Western world” have their problems and are far, far from perfect, but one need not look too far and long each day to find reasons to be grateful to live where we do. Today I read a report on the use of “breast ironing” in West and Central Africa, a practice that is intended to hide or reduce the sexuality of young women in order to protect them from rape or other sexual abuse.
"Breast ironing" typically involves pressing a heated object, such as a grinding stone, against a young girl’s breasts to try to stunt their growth. Recent studies show it’s widespread in Cameroon, where one in four young girls is subjected to the traumatic process at the hands of relatives who are trying to lessen their sexual attractiveness. It’s estimated that four million women in Cameroon have suffered through this process, which is also a long-time practice in Chad, Togo, Benin, and Guinea-Conakry. Both the relatives and the victims believe that the procedure is a good thing.
Although counterintuitive, the practice has become more common in urban areas that in rural villages because the threat is seen to be greater in the cities and towns. Interestingly, in Cameroon it’s more common in the Christian-dominated south than in the Muslim-dominated north.
It comes as no surprise that this process has harmful side-effects, including severe pain and abscesses, infections, breast cancer, and the disappearance of one or both breasts. Cameroon has launched a nationwide educational program to advise people of the impacts and eradicate the practice, an effort similar to the campaign that dramatically reduced the equally horrific practice of female genital mutilation in that country.
It’s hard for us to understand the mix of fear and ignorance that leads to practices like this. They shock our conscience. Hopefully, once the stunned reaction passes, we realize anew the need for continual education and international outreach in third-world countries. Hearing about children being subjected to almost unspeakable "traditional" practices reminds us that countries like the U.S. can and should help support such educational and outreach programs.
When I think about “foreign aid” I tend to think about the pressing need for food, water, clothing, shelter and medicines, all of which are obviously essential for survival and minimal well being. But, when I think about female genital mutilation and breast ironing it doesn’t take long to realize the list of absolute essentials is longer.
Over the last few years, my wife and I have committed to including reputable international aid groups in our list of charitable donations. Money won’t solve everything but it’s something we can do now and it feels better than reading shocking news stories and then doing nothing about them. Unfortunately, there are a half dozen shocking news stories every day, which can quickly deplete all manner of resources. In the face of that problem, our default focal point has become children and the improvement of their health and well being.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring. Onward.
4 Comments:
It's sad to think that over there they will mutilate the young girls rather than educate the boys to reduce the amount of sexual crimes. Seems like common sense to us, but not everyone thinks the way we do. At least they could just use an ace bandage to bind the girls rather than burning them! Jessi
"It’s hard for us to understand the mix of fear and ignorance that leads to practices like this."
Yes, this is clearly ridiculous. But I found it stunning that in our country not everyone is embracing the new vaccine for cervical cancer. Apparently some religious conservatives fought approval of the vaccine because they felt it would encourage young women to become sexually active! They were FIGHTING APPROVAL OF A VACCINE TO PREVENT CANCER.
I find that to be a "mix of fear and ignorance" too.
It wasn't just "religious conservatives". I watched a segment on CNN the other night where the cervical cancer vaccine was the topic of converstion. There were MANY different groups debating the way that the vaccine should be PROMOTED, not once did they fight against the approval of the vaccine. The MANY includes the Dems and Reps "power players". I think that the "Christian or Religious Conservatives" or "Extremeists" are being TOO easly labled as ignorat or even evil. There is a great ignorance in that kind of labeling. The voice of an outspoken individual does not mean the mass is being represented. I know that isn't the case for me.
Religious conservatives were fighting the vaccine and continue to do so. HOTS identified the Christian conservative groups who have spoken out against it, most of whom are heavy hitters in the Religious Right (see July 14 post).
The CNN program would not have shown anyone fighting approval of the vaccine because it has been approved and that discussion is over. Now the argument has moved into the "whether to get it / how to implement it" stage and most of the Christian conservative groups are taking the position that the vaccine should not be mandatory. "It's good and it's lifesaving; but it's not needed for my child because we have high values." Good luck with that.
Kids make mistakes and have sex; and some parents make mistakes and assume their kids aren't having sex. The only safe thing to do is to protect all kids.
After all, as one comedian said, getting a tetanus shot doesn't encourage people to step on a rusty nail.
Post a Comment
<< Home